BAC SP #2 ABC X 2 Review Of Ar Lynn Purcell’s Presentation To Burien Re. SAMP EIS 2018 V 2012 0001

We’ve identified 2 general areas of concern for the clients. The questions and comments are addressed below: Growth in impacts between 2012-2018 not addressed through the NEP A review SEA 3rd Runway Use NEPA reviews are required for federal actions which in the airport context, are typically those associated with the approval, execution, or funding of projects. NEPA reviews are intended to assess the impacts resulting from a proposed action. In the case of the SAMP, NEPA will identify the environmental impacts associated with the construction of projects within the S AMP. At least three scenarios will be included: 1) Existing conditions (current operations and impacts), 2) Future conditions with implementation of the S AMP projects (based on forecast operational levels and resulting impacts), and 3) No-'.Action future scenario with forecast operations and resulting impacts). This will represent total operations and impacts with no S AMP projects implemented. The growth in impacts based on the growth in operations from 2012-2018 will be included in the existing conditions assessment in the S AMP NEPA review. This will include noise exposure contours based on the existing operations which is the product of the growth since 2012. NEP A will not specifically look at a comparison of conditions from 2012-2018. This would have been analyzed in previous NEPA work, associated with construction projects completed by the Port. The last Part 150 analyzed operations and noise exposure from 2013 (existing/baseline conditions) and 2018 (future/forecast conditions). The Part 150 included updates to the Airport’s Noise…
V V