StART Dec 11 2019 presentation two

• Two Noise Abatement Departure Profiles (NADPs) are followed domestically and internationally: the Close-in and Distant departure profiles • A Close-in NADP is more beneficial in abating noise in areas closer to the runway end; while a Distant NADP is more beneficial in abating noise in areas farther down the departure corridor • A Distant NADP appears to provide the most benefits to the developed areas in the SEA environs Key Points esassoc.com PORT OF SEATTLE Presentation Overview • Introduction • Background on Abatement Departure Profiles • Review the SEA NADP Noise Analysis Results • Recommendations • Respond to Questions from StART Members esassoc.com PORT OF SEATTLE • To determine the NADPs currently in use at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA), ESA surveyed five airlines operating Boeing 737-800s at SEA • The existing NADPs were normalized to Stage Length 4 conditions and aircraft noise exposure was modeled using the Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) • ESA compared the Sound Exposure Level (SEL) Contours and Grid Point values for the Close-In and Distant NADPs for four runway ends: 16L, 16C, 34R, and 34C • The analysis identified a preferred NADP for use at SEA Introduction esassoc.com PORT OF SEATTLE • After the technical work was completed and presented to the StART Working Group on October 14, 2019, Delta Air Lines conducted a internal review of its response to the NADP Survey • As a result of that review, Delta Air Lines determined that its survey response incorrectly reflects the NADP that it…
V V