The Airport Communities Podcast
Last week we took the easy way out and provided a podcast version of our popular Part 150 for Dummies article. This week, we get even lazier, answering reader questions, in order to give the crew a chance to catch up, which is no small task
Since we began in 2016, every article we’ve written has talked about the Sustainable Airport Master Plan in the future tense. Now that it’s here, we not only have to change hundreds of articles, we have to develop content to describe the path forward.
Still, this episode is useful. Most of the questions we get are the same. Over and over. Each of these questions are ‘teasers’ for future episodes already on the schedule.
SAMP Webinar
Where our host apologizes for daring to joke about an event date. Won’t happen again! There is still time to sign up for the Port of Seattle’s SAMP webinar on Wednesday October 8, 6:00pm.
The thought was to tell people how the entire SAMP public engagement is just another feature of The Casino. We think you should take airport expansion very seriously. We do not recommend that you take the SAMP process seriously.
Des Moines City Council “Negative-Impact Airport Usage Fee”
We respond to a proposal by Des Moines City Councilmember Matt Mahoney to create a statewide “negative-impact airport usage fee.” This is unbelievably illegal.
How Can SAMP Provide More Operations Than the Third Runway?
We always get questions wondering how the SAMP can provide more operations than the Third Runway. Before the Third Runway, there were over 400,000 operations a year on two runways. People forget that. They could always fit in many more operations. But it is so counter-intuitive people seem to have trouble believing.
Air Traffic Control Is Going to Hell
We always get questions when there is any glitch in airport travel. People have it backwards. We’re preparing an episode on ATC. We keep trying to tell people that airports are a factory. Remember that TV episode with Lucy and Ethel and the chocolate assembly line? ATC is one of the most complex systems in the world, but in spite of that, when the machine gets too fast they simply slow everything down. It angers people, airlines loses millions. But all the ‘delay’ is how they keep us safe. What keeps things constrained is that the US runs ATC on the cheap. God help all airport communities if they ever get the funding they ask for every year.
Tree Cutting
We got several letters about a letter we wrote to the Burien City Council. It didn’t seem supportive enough about tree cutting under the Flight Corridor Safety Program at Mathison Park. As we said in Ep #7: Everybody Loves Trees, the FCSP has been a matter of public record since 2016. One can yell at the Port of Seattle for doing it in the first place, but how does that help? Maybe they’re able to do it because your city hasn’t been taking it seriously enough.
Regardless, acting surprised and expressing outrage at the 30-day notice is the Casino at work. Instead, cities should develop long term agreements years in advance. That is what airport mitigation looks like.
Laws vs. Regs
We get regular questions about ‘airport laws’. For the nerds out there, we describe the difference between airport law (USC) and FAA regulations (CFR).
Noise Density Guidelines
Last week we left out an important detail about one of those regulations — Part 150. That was because it has no practical value at the moment. It is from the distant past: property buyouts and noise lands; the other ‘rings’ inside the DNL65.
North Sea-Tac Park
On a related note, we describe an ongoing effort we’ve been engaged in that ties together all our work: North Sea-Tac Park. This time it’s about a law, specifically USC Title 49. An example of how long term mitigation should work. Not the 30-day notice.
Impact Study
We get questions on our STNI 2026 Legislative Agenda, specifically why we keep advocating for another ‘impact study’ like the HOK 1997.
People are frustrated. They are sick to death of weak studies. They want ‘action’. But like North SeaTac Park, the path to big wins has no ‘easy button’. We need the right study. The weakest part of the HOK involved ‘socioeconomic impacts’. But that work was impossible since the property buyouts which were happening about the same time.
We describe another long term project we’ve been working on — gathering all that data concerning those ‘inner rings’ of the Noise Density Guidelines.
Every property buyout was a real estate negotiation and the economic forces have not changed. This should be at the core of socioeconomics for any future study.
“The truth is out there.”
Part 150 for Dummies
Podcast Ep #2: The Casino
Podcast Ep #7: Everybody Loves Trees!
STNI: Legislation 2026
To learn the rest of the story on each of these programs: stni.info/subscribe
- Subscribe to our video feed
- Find us on all the best podcasts, including Apple and Spotify, or subscribe via SSAppleSpotifyYoutube
Thank you for all you do to inform us on this issue. I spent a lot of time writing my NEPA comments only to read your post and realize I needed to completely reframe them. If you plan to have advice about the SEPA review process, I hope you are able to provide that soon so that I can do it right the first time!