EXH0635024619

PCHBPollution Control Hearings Board of the State of Washington

5808 /_ke Washington BIvQ, N.E. Suite 200 Kirklan_3, WA gs033-T350 425-822-8880 ° Fax: 425-889-8808 • www.l_arametrix,com p ._. : DRAFT MEMORANDUM To: Keith Smith February 28, 2000 From: Doug Henderson / Linclz Logan 556-2912-001 (61) Subject: Range-Finding WEtLs Background Thismemorandum pro_ddes a scope and budget for conducting range-finding Water-Effect Ratios (WEKs) using just receiving water from Miller and Des Moines Creeks. Recall that such testing is necessary in the event that the Port is not granted a mixing zone. The budget ordy includes costs associated with conducting the tests, and does not include - additional consulting time that may be required (e.g., meetings with the Port or with DOE or responding to Port comments). The objective of the range-finding WElLs is to determine if the final WERs would be robust enough to warrant the expense of conducting definitive studies, The range-finding studies consist of concurrent acute toxicity tests with copper- spiked site water and copper-spiked laboratory water. A median lethal concentration (LC50) is then determined for each water, and the two LC50s are compared to generate a WEK: LC50 Site Water =WER LC50 Laboratory Water The WER is then applied to the generic water quality standard to derive a site-specific standard= WER * Generic WQS = Site-specific WQS For example, if the water quality standard for a chemical is 3 _tg/L, and a WER of 3 is derived for a particular site, the resulting site-specific water quality standard would be 9 _tg/L. Unlike a definitive WE,R study, exposure concentrationsm a…
V V